Kislak v. Kreedian

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that there must be an agreement to share jointly on some agreed basis in not only profits but also losses
• stating that even in cases where a joint venture is supposedly implied from the intentions and conduct of the parties, it is still necessary to allege and prove every single element of a joint venture
• stating that even in cases where a joint venture is supposedly implied from the intentions and conduct of the parties, it is still necessary to allege and prove every single element of a joint venture
• conclusory allegations insufficient to state cause of action for breach of contract
• “It has been universally held that while ‘joint adventure’ and partnership are separate legal relationships, both relationships are governed by the same rules of law. The laws governing partnership are applicable to joint adventurers.”
• “[I]t is now understood that [partnerships and joint ventures] are not identical and that decisions defining and describing partnerships are not necessarily controlling upon the question of whether parties to a particular contract are joint adventurers.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).