Kislak v. Kreedian

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that there must be an agreement to share jointly on some agreed basis in not only profits but also losses
• stating that even in cases where a joint venture is supposedly implied from the intentions and conduct of the parties, it is still necessary to allege and prove every single element of a joint venture
• stating that even in cases where a joint venture is supposedly implied from the intentions and conduct of the parties, it is still necessary to allege and prove every single element of a joint venture
• conclusory allegations insufficient to state cause of action for breach of contract
• “It has been universally held that while ‘joint adventure’ and partnership are separate legal relationships, both relationships are governed by the same rules of law. The laws governing partnership are applicable to joint adventurers.”
• “[I]t is now understood that [partnerships and joint ventures] are not identical and that decisions defining and describing partnerships are not necessarily controlling upon the question of whether parties to a particular contract are joint adventurers.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

91 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• NesSmith Electric Co. v. Kelley (In Re Kelley)
  M.D. Florida· 1988-02-23· cited 62×
• Odham v. Foremost Dairies, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1961-03-22· cited 61×
• Browning v. Peyton
  Eleventh Circuit· 1990-12-14· cited 55×
• Kirsch ex rel. Kirsch v. Brightstar Corp.
  N.D. Illinois· 2015-01-13· cited 51×
• Florida Tomato Packers v. Wilson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-05-07· cited 39×
• Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. United States
  Fifth Circuit· 1975-09-29· cited 36×
• Donna Lee H. Williams v. Michael Blutrich
  Eleventh Circuit· 2002-12-20· cited 34×
• Jackson-Shaw Co. v. Jacksonville Aviation Authority
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2008-12-18· cited 32×
• Pinnacle Port Community Association, Inc. v. Charles Orenstein
  Eleventh Circuit· 1989-05-23· cited 31×
• Milu, Inc. v. Duke
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1967-11-21· cited 31×
• Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. Times Pub. Co., Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-21· cited 31×
• Fletcher v. Williams
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-05-21· cited 24×
• Devt. Corp. of Palm Beach v. Wbc Const.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-26· cited 23×
• Fojtasek v. NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.
  S.D. Florida· 2009-05-11· cited 23×
• Peoples Gas System v. Acme Gas Corp.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-01-15· cited 20×
• Nautica International, Inc. v. Intermarine USA, L.P.
  S.D. Florida· 1998-03-17· cited 20×
• Kochan v. American Fire and Casualty Company
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1967-04-26· cited 19×
• National Education Ass'n v. Lee Co. Bd. of Pub. Instr.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1972-03-15· cited 19×
• Offices Togolais Des Phosphates v. Mulberry Phosphates, Inc.
  M.D. Florida· 1999-07-07· cited 18×
• Hallock v. Holiday Isle Resort & Marina
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-27· cited 16×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Green v. Putnam
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1957-03-06· cited 24×