Skip to main content
· 2/20/2002

Kishter v. Principal Life Insurance

Citations

  • 186 F. Supp. 2d 438
  • 27 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1966
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2895
  • 2002 WL 257683

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that \the Second Circuit's reasoning in Strom has been superseded by Great-West \
  • stating that “the Second Circuit’s reasoning in Strom has been superseded by Great-West”
  • dismissing breach of fiduciary duty claim based on the defendant “representing to [the plaintiff’s deceased partner] that [the plaintiff] was entitled to benefits under an ERISA plan when, in fact, she received no such benefits”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mukasey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.