Kirtdoll v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that actions of defendant, causing water, logs, and ice to be driven upon the shore of plaintiffs land, were in nature of continuing trespass
• concluding that the acts of the defendant in placing and maintaining piling in a river, which caused water, logs, and ice to drive upon the shore of the landowner’s property, were in the nature of a continuing trespass
• recognizing that the maintenance of a log pile which caused recurring damages to property was in the nature of a continuing trespass or nuisance in which successive actions could be brought for the damages as they accrue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).