Kirsner v. Edelmann

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] judge is presumed to know the law, and thus is not required to set out in intimate detail each and every step of his or her thought process.”
• “[A] judge is presumed to know the law, and thus is not required to set out in intimate detail each and every step of his or her thought process.”
• “[A] judge is presumed to know the law, and thus is not required to set out in intimate detail each and every step in his or her thought process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).