Ohio Supreme Court· 3/21/1951
Kirsheman v. Paulin
Citations
- 98 N.E.2d 26
- 155 Ohio St. 137
- 155 Ohio St. (N.S.) 137
- 44 Ohio Op. 134
- 1951 Ohio LEXIS 547
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining the statutory significance of the Latin phrase, espressio unius est exclusio alterius
- explaining the statutory significance of the Latin phrase, espressio uni-us est exclusio alterius
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Middleton, Taet, Matthias, Weygandt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Investors REIT One v. JacobsOhio Supreme Court· 1989-11-08· cited 209×
- Bielat v. BielatOhio Supreme Court· 2000-01-05· cited 147×
- In the Matter of Estate of TovreaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-07-21· cited 18×
- In Re Enron Corporation Securities, DerivativeS.D. Texas· 2007-08-24· cited 14×
- Porter v. ProbstOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-08-29· cited 8×
- In re Adoption of W.M.J.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-09-05· cited 2×
- Peau v. MoseleyOhio Supreme Court· 1966-12-28· cited 1×
- Newby v. Enron Corp.S.D. Texas· 2007-08-24· cited 1×
- Bauman v. HogueOhio Supreme Court· 1953-12-09
- In re Estate of GompfOhio Supreme Court· 1964-01-15
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.