· 4/20/1996
Kirschner v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Valley Stream
Citations
- 924 F. Supp. 385
- 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5450
- 1996 WL 196569
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the issue of whether two entities are similarly situated presents a “classic issue of fact” sufficient to defeat the defendants’ motion for summary judgment
- question of whether parties are similarly situated is “classic” issue of fact precluding summary judgment, let alone a dismissal
- “apples should be compared to apples”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spatt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.