Skip to main content
· 4/20/1996

Kirschner v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Valley Stream

Citations

  • 924 F. Supp. 385
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5450
  • 1996 WL 196569

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the issue of whether two entities are similarly situated presents a “classic issue of fact” sufficient to defeat the defendants’ motion for summary judgment
  • question of whether parties are similarly situated is “classic” issue of fact precluding summary judgment, let alone a dismissal
  • “apples should be compared to apples”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spatt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.