Kirschner v. Indus. Comm.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing section 280 of the 1926 Act as “an alternative summary method of collection by notice to the . . . transferee” that “did not create a new obligation, but merely provided a new remedy for enforcing an existing obligation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).