Kirschner Bros. Oil, Inc. v. Pannill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that minimal asserted connections, such as “the incorporation of some of the Defendants in Delaware[,] is of little consequence”
• stating that minimal asserted connections, such as “the incorporation of some of the Defendants in Delaware[,] is of little consequence”
• stating that minimal asserted connections, such as “the incorporation of some of the Defendants in Delaware[,] is of little consequence”
• stating that minimal asserted connections, such as “the incorporation of some of the Defendants in Delaware[,] is of little consequence”
• reduction of interference with efficient conduct of Defendant’s business during the trial is important factor for balancing convenience
• “common sense precludes denying a motion to transfer on the basis of inconvenience to parties who have joined the motion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).