District Court of Appeal of Florida· 6/21/1983
Kirksey v. State
Citations
- 433 So. 2d 1236
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- generally, use of disjunctive in statute indicates alternatives and requires that such alternatives be treated separately
- generally, use of disjunctive in statute indicates alternatives and requires that such alternatives be treated separately
- generally, use of the disjunctive \or\ in a statute indicates alternatives were intended and requires that such alternatives be treated separately; hence, language in clause following disjunctive is considered inapplicable to subject matter of preceding clause
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wigginton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Thorp v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-01-11· cited 14×
- Ross v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-12-27· cited 10×
- Fortune Ins. Co. v. Department of Ins.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-12-08· cited 6×
- Rich Electronics, Inc. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-22· cited 5×
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-08-03· cited 4×
- Southeastern Staffing v. Fl. Dept. of Ins.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-12-11· cited 3×
- Ellinwood v. Board of Architecture and Interior DesignDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-02-03· cited 2×
- State v. HermanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-04-04· cited 1×
- Roberts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-03-11· cited 1×
- Gelzer v. DiamondDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-24
- AgoFlorida Attorney General Reports· 1996-07-10
- AgoFlorida Attorney General Reports· 1989-10-13
- AgoFlorida Attorney General Reports· 1987-01-20
- AgoFlorida Attorney General Reports· 2007-01-26
- AgoFlorida Attorney General Reports· 1984-01-26
- FETTIG'S CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. PARADISE PROPERTIES & INTERIORS \LLC\District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-08-12
- FETTIG'S CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. PARADISE PROPERTIES & INTERIORS \LLC\District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-11-04
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- United States v. Di ReSupreme Court· 1948-01-19· cited 1,525×
- People v. MaddoxCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-02-28· cited 303×
- State v. FairbanksOhio Supreme Court· 1972-11-15· cited 109×
- Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-10-08· cited 64×
- Mrs. Frances E. Quindlen v. The Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaFifth Circuit· 1973-08-13· cited 61×
- United States v. George Robinson and Annita DanielsSecond Circuit· 1963-12-18· cited 52×
- Upshaw v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1977-10-26· cited 46×
- City of Miami v. NelsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-03-15· cited 27×
- McKenzie Tank Lines, Inc. v. McCauleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-08-31· cited 14×
- State v. ErdmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 7×
- Holt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1960-03-30· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.