Kirksey v. Assurance Tire Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding this court can find facts in accordance with the preponderance of evidence when determining a jurisdictional question in a Workers’ Compensation case
• holding this court can find facts in accordance with the preponderance of evidence when determining a jurisdictional question in a Workers’ Compensation case
• holding gratuitous workers are not employees
• this Court can find facts in accordance with the preponderance of evidence when determining jurisdictional question in Workers' Compensation case
• this Court can find facts in accordance with the preponderance of evidence when determining jurisdictional question in Workers’ Compensation case
• this Court can find facts in accordance with preponderance of evidence when determining jurisdictional question in Workers’ Compensation case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).