Kirksey (Jimmy) Vs. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that record was sufficient to support no contact with biological sons after defendant was convicted of raping his stepdaughter
• affirming imposition of a no- contact order as to all of a sex offender’s children when he was convicted of sexually abusing only one of them
• upholding the sentencing condition prohibiting contact with the defendant’s minor children because of the defendant’s history of establishing trust in a parental role to victimize other minors
• following the defendant’s conviction of four counts of child rape in the first degree, the court upheld the no-contact order between the defendant and his biological children, as the children were within the class of persons victimized
• following the defendant’s conviction of four counts of child rape in the first degree, the court upheld the no-contact order between the defendant and his biological children, as the children were within the class of persons victimized
• argument based on witness’ inconsistent statements bears on credibility and reflects matter for juiy to resolve

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).