Kirkpatrick v. Strosberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that damages must be proved with reasonable certainty and cannot be based on conjecture or speculation
• taking attorney fees into account where no compensatory damages were awarded and finding a ratio of 3.5 to 1 permissible
• noting the trial court may consider “its own knowledge and experience to assess the time required to complete particular activities”
• upholding a punitive damage award under the ICFA where a seller advertised that the ceiling height in new condominium units would be nine feet despite knowing that it would be several inches shorter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).