Kirkpatrick v. Introspect Healthcare Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Article 2 did not apply to contract between interi- or designer and healthcare corporation
• holding that court decides as a matter of law whether contract is ambiguous; noting that parties’ disagreement as to proper interpretation does not establish ambiguity
• holding that the interpretation of a contract cannot ignore the contract = s express provisions
• holding that the interpretation of a contract cannot ignore the contract's express provisions
• remanding for trial on merits of breach of contract claim noting that the appellate court will not determine questions of fact on appeal
• declining to adopt a “strained” interpretation of a contract that would “ignore the [contract’]s express terms”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).