Kirkman v. Latkowski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• collecting district court cases that apply Rule 9(b) to negligent misrepresentation claims
• rejecting non-signatory’s promissory estoppel claim where “sophisticated parties [had] entered into a bargained for contract,” because the “terms of the contract . . . are not ‘clear and unambiguous’ promises” to the non-signatory
• collecting district court cases that apply Rule 9(b) to negligent misrepresentation claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).