Kirkland v. Union Pacific Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “plaintiffs mere conclusory allegation [] is insufficient to establish good cause”
• holding, on facts similar to this case, that when the facts on the recording are substantive and they were recorded in a “less than forthright manner,” the recording should be disclosed prior to a deposition on it, to prevent the risk of “sandbagg[ing]”
• holding, on facts similar to this case, that when the facts on the recording are substantive and they were recorded in a “less than forthright manner,” the recording should be disclosed prior to a deposition on it, to prevent the risk of “sandbagg[ing]”
• denying motion for protective order to delay production of audio recordings until after deposition
• holding, on facts similar to this case, that when the facts on the recording are substantive and they were recorded in a A less than forthright manner, @ the recording should be disclosed prior to a deposition on it, to prevent the risk of A sandbagg[ing] @
• ‘Where a specific showing of good cause has been made, Rule 26(c) authorizes the court to issue a protective order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).