Skip to main content

Kirkland v. State

Citations

  • 106 So. 3d 4
  • 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 65
  • 2013 WL 11876

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the trial court should have orally pronounced the $100 investigative cost, as it is a discretionary cost and not a mandatory'cost”
  • striking the Public Defender fee and remanding for the trial court to advise defendant of the right to a hearing to contest it
  • “[A] defect in an information is waived if no objection is timely made so long as the information does not wholly fail to state a crime.”
  • “[T]he Public Defender fee should be struck because the trial court did not advise Appellant of his right to contest the fee when it was orally imposed.” (citing § 938.29(5), Fla. Stat.; Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.720(d)(1))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marstiller, Thomas, Wolf

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.