· 9/26/2006
Kirkland v. St. Vrain Valley School District No. Re-1J
Citations
- 464 F.3d 1182
- 25 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 376
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 24269
- 2006 WL 2733848
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing a public school district’s interest in immediately suspending an administrator who had overseen “an unexpected multi-million dollar deficit”
- finding that the plaintiff waived his procedural due process claim challenging the adequacy of post-deprivation process where he could have filed a grievance challenging the deprivation but “chose not to do so”
- “[Ajlthough Kirkland has a private interest that will be affected by a suspension, that effect is attenuated by the relatively prompt post-suspension hearing that is provided.”
- “It is by now well established that due process, unlike some legal rules, is not a technical concep tion with a fixed content unrelated to time, place and circumstance.
- no due process violation to suspend teacher with no prior notice during financial emergency
- “Because the resignation agreement ... never became an enforceable contract, Kirkland never gained a property interest in that agreement such that it would be subject to due process protections.” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ebel, O'Brien, Tymkovich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.