Skip to main content
· 9/26/2006

Kirkland v. St. Vrain Valley School District No. Re-1J

Citations

  • 464 F.3d 1182
  • 25 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 376
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 24269
  • 2006 WL 2733848

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing a public school district’s interest in immediately suspending an administrator who had overseen “an unexpected multi-million dollar deficit”
  • finding that the plaintiff waived his procedural due process claim challenging the adequacy of post-deprivation process where he could have filed a grievance challenging the deprivation but “chose not to do so”
  • “[Ajlthough Kirkland has a private interest that will be affected by a suspension, that effect is attenuated by the relatively prompt post-suspension hearing that is provided.”
  • “It is by now well established that due process, unlike some legal rules, is not a technical concep tion with a fixed content unrelated to time, place and circumstance.
  • no due process violation to suspend teacher with no prior notice during financial emergency
  • “Because the resignation agreement ... never became an enforceable contract, Kirkland never gained a property interest in that agreement such that it would be subject to due process protections.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ebel, O'Brien, Tymkovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.