Kirk T. Milam v. Sheila J. Milam

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that Code § 8.01-678 requires harmless error review “in all cases” (quoting Tynes v. Commonwealth, 49 Va. App. 17, 23 n.3, 635 S.E.2d 688, 690 n.3 (2006))
• declining to consider an assignment of error premised on argument not presented to the trial court
• “The issue of a party’s income is a question of fact that we will not disturb unless it is plainly wrong or without evidence to support it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).