Skip to main content
· 12/20/2001

Kirk S. Corsello v. Lincare, Inc., Lincare Holdings, Inc.

Citations

  • 276 F.3d 1229
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 26992
  • 2001 WL 1636202

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a judgment was not final even though the sole unadjudicated claims were subject to an automatic bankruptcy stay
  • holding that claims against a defendant that were subject to an automatic bankruptcy stay are still pending if they are not resolved by the district court
  • reflecting that the question of whether a district court order constituted a final decision for purposes of § 1291 is a jurisdictional issue subject to sua sponte review
  • “In this case, the district court did not adjudicate [the plaintiff’s] claims against [one of the defendants], and thus, there is no appealable final deci- sion.”
  • “In this case, the district court did not adjudicate [the plaintiff’s] claims USCA11 Case: 21-13825 Date Filed: 11/28/2022 Page: 8 of 8 8 Opinion of the Court 21-13825 against [one of the defendants], and thus, there is no appealable fi- nal decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmondson, Dubina, Cox

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.