· 12/20/2001
Kirk S. Corsello v. Lincare, Inc., Lincare Holdings, Inc.
Citations
- 276 F.3d 1229
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 26992
- 2001 WL 1636202
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a judgment was not final even though the sole unadjudicated claims were subject to an automatic bankruptcy stay
- holding that claims against a defendant that were subject to an automatic bankruptcy stay are still pending if they are not resolved by the district court
- reflecting that the question of whether a district court order constituted a final decision for purposes of § 1291 is a jurisdictional issue subject to sua sponte review
- “In this case, the district court did not adjudicate [the plaintiff’s] claims against [one of the defendants], and thus, there is no appealable final deci- sion.”
- “In this case, the district court did not adjudicate [the plaintiff’s] claims USCA11 Case: 21-13825 Date Filed: 11/28/2022 Page: 8 of 8 8 Opinion of the Court 21-13825 against [one of the defendants], and thus, there is no appealable fi- nal decision.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmondson, Dubina, Cox
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.