Ninth Circuit· 5/6/2016
Kirk Rishor v. Bob Ferguson
Citations
- 822 F.3d 482
- 94 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1161
- 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 8403
- 2016 WL 2610176
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the rule against successive petitions applies to 28 Rule 59(e) motions in the habeas context only when the motion raises entirely new claims
- determining that the petitioner’s collateral 20 attacks were procedurally barred after finding the petitioner had knowingly, intelligently, 21 and voluntarily plead guilty to the alleged crimes
- explaining that Tollett bars 8 any double jeopardy claim where petitioner pleaded guilty unless petitioner 9 alleges and proves that plea was not knowing and voluntary
- holding failure to obtain appellate authorization for successive petition is jurisdictional
- observing that Faretta is silent on whether a defendant who has waived his right to counsel is entitled to a second Faretta 2 Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975). SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A e canvass on remand
- “A petitioner's failure to seek such authorization from the appropriate appellate court before filing a second or successive habeas petition acts as a jurisdictional bar.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hawkins, Tallman, Lefkow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court· 2007-06-04· cited 34,635×
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court· 2011-04-04· cited 5,931×
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1932-11-07· cited 4,979×
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-13· cited 3,761×
- Yarborough v. AlvaradoSupreme Court· 2004-06-01· cited 3,494×
- Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court· 1973-04-17· cited 3,425×
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court· 1970-04-06· cited 3,248×
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court· 2005-06-23· cited 3,107×
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-12-16· cited 3,075×
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1977-05-16· cited 2,626×
- Woodford v. VisciottiSupreme Court· 2002-11-04· cited 2,207×
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court· 1943-01-04· cited 2,192×
- Renico v. LettSupreme Court· 2010-05-03· cited 1,940×
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court· 1962-04-30· cited 1,897×
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 1,790×
- Wood v. AllenSupreme Court· 2010-01-20· cited 1,388×
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court· 1982-04-19· cited 1,321×
- Carey v. MusladinSupreme Court· 2006-12-11· cited 1,245×
- United States v. Paul Winestock, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 2003-04-25· cited 1,234×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.