Kiriakides v. SCH. DIST. OF GREENVILLE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the institution of condemnation proceedings does not constitute a taking, even where the condemning authority abandons the action nine months later
• stating that under a claim for regulatory inverse condemnation, Penn Central requires the court to look at “(1
• stating that under a claim for regulatory inverse condemnation, Penn Central requires the court to look at “(1) the economic impact on the claimant, especially the extent to which the governmental entity has interfered with the claimant’s investment-backed expectations, and (2
• \An abuse of discretion occurs when the conclusions of the [master-in-equity] are either controlled by an error of law or are based on unsupported factual conclusions.\
• \[T]he specific amount of attorney['s] fees awarded pursuant to a statute authorizing reasonable attorney['s] fees is left to the discretion of the [master-in- equity] and will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).