· 10/25/2013
Kirell Taylor v. United States
Citations
- 113 Fed. Cl. 171
- 2013 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1654
- 2013 WL 5770765
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Tucker Act does not provide independent jurisdiction over claims for injunc-tive relief in contractual dispute cases
- holding that the TuckerAct does not provide independent jurisdiction over claims for injunctive relief in contractual dispute cases
- holding that the Tucker Act does not provide independent jurisdiction over claims for injunc-tive relief in contractual dispute cases
- holding “claims 8 for equitable relief . . . lie outside the Tucker Act jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims”
- noting that the Constitution cannot be a valid contract between a private citizen and the United States
- noting that the Constitution cannot be a valid contract between a private citizen and the United States
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wheeler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.