Skip to main content
· 10/25/2013

Kirell Taylor v. United States

Citations

  • 113 Fed. Cl. 171
  • 2013 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1654
  • 2013 WL 5770765

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Tucker Act does not provide independent jurisdiction over claims for injunc-tive relief in contractual dispute cases
  • holding that the TuckerAct does not provide independent jurisdiction over claims for injunctive relief in contractual dispute cases
  • holding that the Tucker Act does not provide independent jurisdiction over claims for injunc-tive relief in contractual dispute cases
  • holding “claims 8 for equitable relief . . . lie outside the Tucker Act jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims”
  • noting that the Constitution cannot be a valid contract between a private citizen and the United States
  • noting that the Constitution cannot be a valid contract between a private citizen and the United States

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wheeler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.