Skip to main content
· 2/24/1992

Kirby v. Wildenstein

Citations

  • 784 F. Supp. 1112
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2292
  • 1992 WL 36486

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the special damages requirement goes to the very heart of a cause of action, and that courts apply this requirement strictly and routinely grant motions to dismiss for failure to allege special damages with the requisite specificity
  • product disparagement actions differ from libel actions in that they deal with “words or conduct which tend to disparage or reflect negatively on the quality, condition or value of a product or property”
  • “A catalogue raisonné is regarded as a definitive catalogue of the works of a particular artist; inclusion of a painting in a catalogue raisonné serves to authenticate the work, while non-inclusion suggests that the work is not genuine.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sand

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.