Kirby v. Milum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Personal injury, however, for purposes of inverse condemnation does not constitute personal property that can be taken.”
• “To recover at trial, plaintiff must show that the objects on private property adjacent to the right-of-way were unauthorized.”
• “To recover at trial, plaintiff must show that the objects on private property adjacent to the right-of-way were unauthorized.”
• plaintiff failed to come forward with evidence to counter defendant’s evidence that driver’s actions were sole cause of the accident
• trial court properly granted summary judgment to County for an alleged nuisance causing personal injury because such injury does not constitute personal property that can be taken for purposes of inverse condemnation
• measure of damages in an inverse condemnation case same as in condemnation cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).