Skip to main content
· 11/3/2004

Kirby v. City Of Elizabeth City

Citations

  • 388 F.3d 440
  • 21 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1826
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 22962

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that even a minor oral reprimand, under certain circumstances, is sufficiently adverse for purposes of a First Amendment retaliation claim if it chills speech
  • stating that injunctive relief sought by the plaintiff could only be awarded against the officers in their official capacities
  • “The claims based on the allegation that [Plaintiff] was treated differently in retaliation for his speech are, at their core, free-speech retaliation claims 25 that do not implicate the Equal Protection Clause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.