Kirby v. Citizens' Tel. Co.
Citations
- 17 S.D. 362
- 97 N.W. 3
- 1903 S.D. LEXIS 61
Syllabus
<p>1. Const, art. 6, § 13, providing that private property shall not he taken oi” damaged for public use without just compensation, and. that the fee' of land taken for highways, shall remain in the owner, and article 17, § 18, providing that compensation shall be made before property is taken or injured, do not apply to the use of the streets of a city for the purposes for which they have been dedicated.</p> <p>2. Under the direct provisions of Laws 1885, p. 208, c. 141, § 3 (Rev. Civ. ■ Code 1903, § 554), a city may permit a telephone company to erect poles and maintain a telephone system on its streets.</p> <p>3. The. construction, maintenance, and operation of a telephone system on the streets of a city in such a manner as not to cause unnecessary injury or incoDveniénce to property owners is not an additional servitude for which an abutting owner is entitled to compensation.</p>
Judges: Corson, Fuller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hall v. Lea County Electric Cooperative, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 17×
- Aberdeen Cable TV Service, Inc. v. City of AberdeenSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1970-05-05· cited 16×
- Spangler v. City of MitchellSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1915-04-27· cited 16×
- Frazier v. East Tennessee Telephone Co.Tennessee Supreme Court· 1905-09-15· cited 14×
- Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. AvrittCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1905-03-01· cited 13×
- Cosgriff v. Tri-State Telephone & Telegraph Co.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1906-02-28· cited 12×
- Dakota Central Telephone Co. v. Spink County Power Co.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1920-01-30· cited 8×
- State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. JB Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court· 2016-12-07· cited 5×
- Long v. State of S.D.South Dakota Supreme Court· 2017-11-21· cited 4×
- City of Tulsa v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.N.D. Oklahoma· 1934-01-29· cited 4×
- Holida v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-12-30· cited 3×
- Kirby v. Citizens' Telephone Co.South Dakota Supreme Court· 1905-11-01· cited 3×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cater v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1895-04-30· cited 80×
- Pierce v. DrewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1883-10-20· cited 77×
- Attorney General v. Metropolitan RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1878-10-21· cited 51×
- Donovan v. AllertNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1902-06-03· cited 44×
- Hershfield v. Rocky Mountain Bell Telephone Co.Montana Supreme Court· 1892-05-02· cited 24×
- People v. EatonMichigan Supreme Court· 1894-05-18· cited 23×
- Lockhart v. Craig St. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1891-01-05· cited 22×
- Castle v. Bell Tel. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1900-03-21· cited 3×
- Johnson v. New York & P. Telephone & Telegraph Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1902-11-18· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.