· 2/18/1972
Kirby H. Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial District Santa Clara County, State of California
Citations
- 453 F.2d 1252
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, even though 6 habeas jurisdiction was lacking, a petition could not be treated as “one seeking coram nobis 7 because [petitioner] seeks to challenge a state court proceeding in federal court”
- “Coram nobis lies only to challenge errors occurring in the same court.”
- “We are unable to treat this petition 18 as one seeking coram nobis relief because [the petitioner] seeks to challenge a state court 19 proceeding in federal court. Coram nobis lies only to challenge errors occurring in the same 20 court.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Koelsch, Carter, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.