Skip to main content
· 2/18/1972

Kirby H. Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial District Santa Clara County, State of California

Citations

  • 453 F.2d 1252

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, even though 6 habeas jurisdiction was lacking, a petition could not be treated as “one seeking coram nobis 7 because [petitioner] seeks to challenge a state court proceeding in federal court”
  • “Coram nobis lies only to challenge errors occurring in the same court.”
  • “We are unable to treat this petition 18 as one seeking coram nobis relief because [the petitioner] seeks to challenge a state court 19 proceeding in federal court. Coram nobis lies only to challenge errors occurring in the same 20 court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koelsch, Carter, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.