Kiray v. Hy-Vee, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing the Supreme Court extended its ruling that discrimination against jurors based on their race violates the Equal Protection Clause to apply to discrimination against jurors based on their gender (citing J.E.B. v. Alabama, 511 U.S. 127, 145 (1994))
• noting plaintiff failed to meet her burden of proof because she had presented \no evidence there were similarly situated individuals outside her protected class who were treated differently\
• under either Call-wood or Williams, the second element requires availability to receive the benefits of the statute
• under any formulation of the prima facie case, the first element is that the plaintiff was a member of a protected class
• subsequently explaining that the plaintiff had failed to meet her burden as to prongs (3)(a) and (3)(b) of the Callwood test and prong (4) of the Williams test
• the prima facie case must be adapted to the factual situation at hand and the language of the federal statute must not be substituted for the language of the Iowa statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).