Kippen v. Jewkes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiff had not met its burden of “actual and imminent” irreparable harm largely because of a slow industry-specific business cycle during the pen-dency of the trial
• explaining that the irreparable harm must be “actual and imminent”
• “[Bjecause we have rejected [Plaintiffs] evidence of consumer confusion, it follows that the district court erred by applying the presumption of irreparable harm.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).