Kipp, L. v. Bellefonte Area SD

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the MAO right-to-charge provision “describes when MAO coverage is secondary to other insurance, and permits (but does not require
• holding that 12 | district court did not abuse its discretion for declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction and 13 | for dismissing remaining state law claims after it “dismissed the only claim over which it had 14 | original jurisdiction”
• explaining that the MAO right-to-charge provision “does not create a federal cause of action in favor of a[n] MAO”
• explaining that the MAO right-to-charge provision “does not create a federal cause of action in favor of a MAO”
• explaining that the MAO right-to- 11 Case: 15-11436 Date Filed: 08/08/2016 Page: 12 of 29 charge provision “describes when MAO coverage is secondary to other insurance, and permits (but does not require
• explaining that once the district court dismisses the only 3 18-56559 claims over which it has original jurisdiction, it does not abuse its discretion in also dismissing the remaining state claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).