Kipin Industries, Inc. v. Van Deilen International, Inc. United Fidelity Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that 8 1 under the Restatement, even an explicit choice of law provision is to be considered a mistake if 2 the chosen law would invalidate an express portion of the contract
• applying law of Michigan, which follows §§ 187 and 188 of the Second Restatement of Conflict of Laws
• enforcing a forum selection clause which stated that “disputes ‘shall be adjudicated by a court of competent jurisdiction sitting in the State of Michigan.’”
• applying the Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws Section 187 Comment E, which Tennessee has accepted, to a choice of law provision under Michigan law
• applying Michigan choice of law rules

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).