Skip to main content
· 4/8/1976

Kinzora v. Kinzora

Citations

  • 37 Ill. App. 3d 290
  • 345 N.E.2d 499
  • 1976 Ill. App. LEXIS 2175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Failure ... to properly and timely secure pro hac vice admission before the district 22 court was a sufficient reason to deny [plaintiffs’] application for attorney's fees.”
  • “Failure ... to properly and timely 8 secure pro hac vice admission before the district court was a sufficient reason to deny 9 [plaintiffs’] application for attorney's fees.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Simkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.