Kintzel v. Kintzel

Citations

• 133 Pa. 71
• 1890 Pa. LEXIS 874

Syllabus

<p>Where the validity of a judgment confessed for the arrears of a dower charge is attacked as collusive, casual declarations of the plaintiff and the defendant, not made in the presence of each other, both parties denying on oath that such declarations had been made, are insufficient of themselves to establish a previous gift of the arrears to the defendant, and that the judgment was therefore collusive and fraudulent.</p>