· 11/20/1985
Kintsche v. Woodard
Citations
- 629 F. Supp. 1349
- 123 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2040
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that variance concerning identity of particular victim was not fatal because indictment’s averment of victim’s name was a nonmaterial allegation and not an essential element
- holding it is not up to this Court to revisit a trial court’s credibility determination in allowing live two-way video testimony when Defendant contends the witness merely fears testifying in general
- applying Craig to reject a State and Federal Confrontation Clause challenge to testimony by “live, two-way, closed-circuit internet broadcast”
- en donde un experto que vivía en otro estado acreditó sufrir de un desorden psicológico severo que le impedia abordar un avión
- donde un experto que vivía en otro estado acreditó sufrir de un desorden psicológico severo que le impedía abordar un avión
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shapiro
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.