Skip to main content
· 11/20/1985

Kintsche v. Woodard

Citations

  • 629 F. Supp. 1349
  • 123 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2040

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that variance concerning identity of particular victim was not fatal because indictment’s averment of victim’s name was a nonmaterial allegation and not an essential element
  • holding it is not up to this Court to revisit a trial court’s credibility determination in allowing live two-way video testimony when Defendant contends the witness merely fears testifying in general
  • applying Craig to reject a State and Federal Confrontation Clause challenge to testimony by “live, two-way, closed-circuit internet broadcast”
  • en donde un experto que vivía en otro estado acreditó sufrir de un desorden psicológico severo que le impedia abordar un avión
  • donde un experto que vivía en otro estado acreditó sufrir de un desorden psicológico severo que le impedía abordar un avión

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shapiro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.