Skip to main content
· 12/21/1987

Kinsey v. Preeson

Citations

  • 746 P.2d 542
  • 1987 WL 1885

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A promise concerning afuture act, when coupled with a present intention not to fulfill the promise, can be a misrepresentation which is actionable as fraud.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vollack, Rovira

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.