Kinsey v. MacUr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s dissemination of copies of a letter to only twenty people constituted public disclosure
• finding public disclosure where defendant maliciously sent letters to a geographically, socially, and professionally diverse group of roughly twenty people
• letters regarding defendant’s behavior, some of which contained personal facts, stated a cause of action for tortious invasions of constitutional right to privacy
• letters regarding defendant's behavior, some of which contained personal facts, stated a cause of action for tortious invasions of constitutional right to privacy
• allegation that private individual disclosed embarrassing personal facts about the plaintiff states a cause of action under Article I, § 1 for invasion of privacy
• except in cases involving physical intrusion, the common law invasion of privacy tort “must be accompanied by publicity in the sense of communication to the public in general or to a large number of persons as distinguished from one individual or a few”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).