Kinser v. Gehl Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• insufficiency caused by admission error inappropriate basis for judgment as a matter of law
• when an error is not of a constitutional dimension, harmless error analysis is applied
• “Although [the deponent] had retired at the time of these depositions, he continued to perform consulting services for [defendant] on projects he had overseen during his full-time tenure with the company.”
• In reviewing the admissibility of expert testimony, “we do not think it necessary to confine our review to the materials accompanying the Daubert hearing request. Rather, we believe we may look at the entire record, including testimony presented at trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).