· 11/1/1982
Kinsel v. Wolfe
Citations
- 459 U.S. 967
- 103 S. Ct. 293
- 51 U.S.L.W. 3339
- 74 L. Ed. 2d 277
- 1982 U.S. LEXIS 4083
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Rule 26 focuses not on the status of the witness, but rather the substance of the testimony.” (quotation omitted)
- “To the extent the treating physician testifies only as to care and treatment of his/her patient, the physician is not considered a specially retained expert [for whom Rule 26(a)(2)(B) disclosures are required].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.