Skip to main content
· 11/1/1982

Kinsel v. Wolfe

Citations

  • 459 U.S. 967
  • 103 S. Ct. 293
  • 51 U.S.L.W. 3339
  • 74 L. Ed. 2d 277
  • 1982 U.S. LEXIS 4083

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Rule 26 focuses not on the status of the witness, but rather the substance of the testimony.” (quotation omitted)
  • “To the extent the treating physician testifies only as to care and treatment of his/her patient, the physician is not considered a specially retained expert [for whom Rule 26(a)(2)(B) disclosures are required].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.