Skip to main content
· 4/20/1926

Kins v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 3 B.T.A. 1348
  • 1926 BTA LEXIS 2416

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • laying out the grounds by which a court abuses its discretion, including the factual findings being unsupported by the record
  • “the trial court is in the best position to analyze the actual necessity of a special dispensation”
  • a trial court has broad discretion to make a variety decisions regarding the conduct of trial
  • courts have power to control trial proceedings, including the use of a support animal
  • “we do not require a showing of ‘substantial need’ or ‘compelling necessity’ like Delaware, in Gomez, 25 A.3d at 798–99, or Hawaii, in Palabay,[]844 P.2d 1”
  • “we do not require a showing of ‘substantial need’ or ‘compelling necessity’ like Delaware, in Gomez, 25 A.3d at 798–99, or Hawaii, in Palabay,[]844 P.2d 1”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Phillips, Trammell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.