Kinoshita v. Canadian Pacific Airlines, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the employer \attempted to [create an atmosphere of job security and fair treatment] with promises of specific treatment in specific situations\
• noting that Parnar explicitly rejects the \bad faith\ exception to the at-will employment doctrine
• “the plaintiffs’ right to compel the company to live up to its promises does not turn on whether they received all of the communications addressed to the employees or not”
• concerned with policies regarding job security and reliance thereon

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).