Skip to main content
· 7/26/1974

Kinning v. Sutton

Citations

  • 220 N.W.2d 485
  • 300 Minn. 555
  • 1974 Minn. LEXIS 1400

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming denial of defendant's motion for new trial where evidence about plaintiff's alleged injury was in \sharp conflict\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.