Skip to main content
· 5/17/1990

Kinney v. Tupperware Co.

Citations

  • 792 P.2d 330
  • 117 Idaho 765
  • 1990 Ida. LEXIS 61

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • occupational disease statute requires claimant to demonstrate exposure to hazard of “non-acute” occupational disease for sixty days before liability attaches
  • “Substantial evidence is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept to support a conclusion.”
  • “[t]he Worker’s Compensation Act is to be construed liberally in favor of the claimant [and] [t]he humane purposes which it seeks to serve leave no room for narrow, technical construction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McDevitt, Bakes, Bistline, Johnson, Boyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.