Kinney v. Russo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that it is improper for a party to use Rule 59(e) “to repeat arguments or to raise new arguments that could have been [raised] before judgment” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “It is not appropriate to use a Rule 59(e) motion to repeat arguments or raise new arguments that could have been made before judgment”
• “It is not appropriate to use a Rule 59(e) motion to repeat arguments or raise new arguments that could have been made before judgment.”
• “It is not appropriate to use a Rule 59(e) motion to repeat arguments or raise new arguments that could have been made before judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).