Skip to main content
· 11/16/1908

Kinney v. Philadelphia Watch Case Co.

Citations

  • 76 N.J.L. 735
  • 47 Vroom 735
  • 71 A. 269
  • 1908 N.J. LEXIS 200

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that provision in contract that suit must be brought within one year after sub-contractor ceased work on project was valid
  • “Where a person offers to do a definite thing, and another accepts conditionally or introduces a new term into the acceptance, his answer is either a mere expression of willingness to treat, or it is a counter proposal, and in neither case is there an agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bergen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.