Skip to main content
· 10/17/1866

Kinney v. Glasgow

Citations

  • 53 Pa. 141
  • 1866 Pa. LEXIS 176

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that compliance with section 508(2) cannot be achieved simply by citing relevant provisions of a statute; the decision must specify the defects in the plan and describe the requirements that have not been met, as well as cite to the statutory authority relied upon
  • holding that compliance with section 508(2) cannot be achieved simply by citing relevant provisions of a statute; the decision must specify the defects in the plan and describe the requirements that have not been met, as well as cite to the statutory authority relied upon
  • holding that, in order to comply with section 508(2) of the MPC, a decision to reject a subdivision plan must not only cite the statutory authority relied upon but must also specify the defects in a plan and describe the requirements which have not been met

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Agnew

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.