Skip to main content
· 9/28/1962

Kinnett v. Hood

Citations

  • 185 N.E.2d 888
  • 25 Ill. 2d 600
  • 3 A.L.R. 3d 1
  • 1962 Ill. LEXIS 539

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Ajnything beyond her maximum needs would be worthless. She could not use it, give it away or dispose of it by will.”
  • the interest of the heirs of the surviving incompetent spouse should not be considered, because the renunciation statute is for the benefit of the incompetent spouse
  • reviewing the two general approaches
  • reviewing the two general approaches

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: House

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.