Skip to main content
· 9/14/2001

Kinnell v. Graves

Citations

  • 265 F.3d 1125
  • 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 4674
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 20433
  • 2001 WL 1078090

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that dismissal of an appeal does not relieve an appellant of the obligation to pay the appellate filing fee in full
  • finding that the court in White held that ifp status in a civil case is not a fundamental right and that § 1915(g) “is rationally related to the legitimate end of deterring frivolous and malicious prisoner lawsuits”
  • finding that the court in White held that ifp status in a civil case is not a fundamental right and that § 1915(g) “is rationally related to the legitimate end of deterring frivolous and malicious prisoner lawsuits”
  • finding that the court in White held that ifp status in a civil case is not a fundamental right and that § 1915(g) “is rationally related to the legitimate end of deterring frivolous and malicious prisoner lawsuits”
  • finding that the court in White held that ifp status in a civil case is not a fundamental right and that § 1915(g) “is rationally related to the legitimate end of deterring frivolous and malicious prisoner lawsuits”
  • finding that the court in White held that ifp status in a civil case is not a fundamental right and that § 1915(g) “is rationally related to the legitimate end of deterring frivolous and malicious prisoner lawsuits”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tacha, Baldock, Brorby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.