· 9/14/2001
Kinnell v. Graves
Citations
- 265 F.3d 1125
- 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 4674
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 20433
- 2001 WL 1078090
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating that dismissal of an appeal does not relieve an appellant of the obligation to pay the appellate filing fee in full
- finding that the court in White held that ifp status in a civil case is not a fundamental right and that § 1915(g) “is rationally related to the legitimate end of deterring frivolous and malicious prisoner lawsuits”
- finding that the court in White held that ifp status in a civil case is not a fundamental right and that § 1915(g) “is rationally related to the legitimate end of deterring frivolous and malicious prisoner lawsuits”
- finding that the court in White held that ifp status in a civil case is not a fundamental right and that § 1915(g) “is rationally related to the legitimate end of deterring frivolous and malicious prisoner lawsuits”
- finding that the court in White held that ifp status in a civil case is not a fundamental right and that § 1915(g) “is rationally related to the legitimate end of deterring frivolous and malicious prisoner lawsuits”
- finding that the court in White held that ifp status in a civil case is not a fundamental right and that § 1915(g) “is rationally related to the legitimate end of deterring frivolous and malicious prisoner lawsuits”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tacha, Baldock, Brorby
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.