Kinkel v. Persson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ORS 138.550(2) and (3) must be read together and, so read, express the legislature’s intent that when a petitioner has appealed and files a petition for post-conviction relief, the petitioner must raise all grounds that could reasonably be asserted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kinkel v. Persson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2018-05-10· cited 24×
• Cunningham v. Premo
  Marion County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-05-04· cited 8×
• Hardin v. Popoff
  Multnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-06-29· cited 5×
• White v. Premo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-05-17· cited 4×
• Cunio v. Premo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-04-12· cited 2×
• White v. Premo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-06-14· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miller v. Alabama
  Supreme Court· 2012-06-25· cited 6,816×
• Padilla v. Kentucky
  Supreme Court· 2010-03-31· cited 5,017×
• Graham v. Florida
  Supreme Court· 2010-05-17· cited 3,477×
• Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. State
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-03-08· cited 428×
• Verduzco v. State of Oregon
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2015-07-30· cited 37×
• Long v. Armenakis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-03-08· cited 14×
• State v. Kinkel
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-10-16· cited 9×
• Kinkel v. Lawhead
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-01-12· cited 6×
• Kinkel v. Lawhead
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2011-05-26· cited 4×