Kinik Company v. International Trade Commission, and Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and Ultimate Abrasive Systems, L.L.C., Intervenors

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the ITC has \no authorization to determine patent validity when that defense was not raised\
• concluding that the ITC has \no authorization to determine patent validity when that defense was not raised\
• deferring to Commission’s inter- pretation of the interplay between Section 337 and 35 U.S.C. 271(g)
• deferring to Commission’s interpretation of the interplay between Section 337 and 35 U.S.C. 271(g)
• \The words of patent claims have the meaning and scope with which they are used in the specification and the prosecution history.\
• “The words of patent claims have the meaning and scope with which they are used in the specification and the prosecution history.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).