Kingvision Pay-Per-View, Ltd. v. Backman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that 22 “there were only 16 patrons in Defendant's establishment at the time of the violation, any 23 commercial advantage or private financial gain was minimal at best.”
• finding no evidence of significant 1 “commercial advantage or private financial gain” where there was no promotional advertising, no 2 || premium for food and drink, no cover charge to enter the establishment, and 16 patrons at the time 3 of the violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).